What the problem is

In 2007 the UK Government sold public land situated behind the British Library in Somers Town, Camden, London, UK - to a consortium made up of the Medical Research Council, University College London, Cancer Research UK and the Wellcome Trust, for them to build a potentially high risk UK centre for medical research and innovation. Many local residents had hoped the land would be used to build new affordable housing and facilities for the community.

Residents across the borough are horrified by such a dangerous, largely secretive establishment being build, and are fiercely opposing the development.

The development has also caused outrage from residents across the London Boroughs as well as nation wide, who object strongly to the cruel and outdated use of animals in medical/scientific experimentation.

Friday, 2 May 2008

OTHER ISSUES

Letters page CNJ 1 May 2008

Need to fight against ‘danger lab’

• WE attended one of the poorly advertised open meetings held by the Medical Research Council consortium at the Somers Town community centre.

The MRC claim that local people are very interested in this exciting project”. The need for huge, top-notch security men on the door of, and inside, the community centre indicates how local people really feel and I hope that the MRC are invoiced for these security costs.

The MRC are also claiming that the centre won’t be “dealing with really dangerous diseases like ebola or lassa fever” yet have not ruled out, and refused to comment on, whether pathogens such as anthrax or rabies would be held in the centre.

It will be at least a “level three” facility, and these do hold deadly viruses and diseases.

Their leaflet states that “no security warnings have been issued about our plans” and that they are liaising with security and emergency authorities.

Indeed, a security alert was leaked by MI5 about the plans for the site also owned by the consortium, on Hampstead Road, close to the Regent’s Park estate. The plans for this were abandoned because the site was too small.

The site at Brill Place, given its proximity to St Pancras International, King’s Cross and Euston, is surely a far more dangerous idea.

As for “working closely with the authorities”, we have as proof, in the form of a document, that emergency services including British Transport Police, London Fire Brigade etc were not informed or consulted.

It is they who will have to deal with a deadly virus leak or terror attack so close to international transport terminals.We are appalled at the statement issued by MRC who say they “understand the concerns about housing but local people need to remember that the centre will help fight diseases such as TB that affect people living in the area and other serious health issues”.

Tuberculosis thrives in overcrowded and poor living conditions. Building the centre on the already overcrowded and deprived Somers Town estate will, in fact, contribute to the spread of diseases such as TB and stress-related illness such as heart disease.

The MRC claim that “security will be improved on the estate by placing the centre here”, in fact horrifying local people.It is very likely that armed police will patrol the estate if the laboratory goes ahead.None of us has forgotten the shooting of innocent Brazilian Jean Charles de Menezes who was killed after being mistaken for a terrorist.The MRC claims that building the lab will boost the economy are groundless.

Building council homes and community facilities will provide employment in areas of construction, security and other projects, employing local people, whereas the MRC plans will provide jobs for people only outside the local area and security will be in the form of state-controlled armed forces.St Pancras & Somers Town Councillor Roger Robinson is calling for an open meeting between the MRC and the people of Camden.

The MRC meet-and-greet sessions were conducted in what amounts to secrecy and were addressed only to the people of Somers Town when the issues affect everyone – not just in Camden but London and further afield.

The MRC are attempting to keep the controversial laboratory plans confined and contained within a small area to prevent feedback and protest. Local people were given just a couple of days’ notice regarding the meet-and-greet sessions and people living in the rest of Camden were not informed at all.

When I asked a representative why this was, I was told (and I quote): “Well, we did dump some leaflets here in the community centre and some more down near one of the shops where the community go.”

This lack of professionalism is very worrying. The consortium claim that they are professional and stringent.

Foot and mouth disease was leaked from an equally professional and stringent facility at Pirbright in Surrey.We suggest that community leaders, tenants’ associations and community centre groups get together to for a Camden people’s forum in support of the Somers Town People’s Forum to give all those across Camden who will be affected a stronger voice in campaigning against this.

Mandy Ford & Sue WHitaker, Elijah B, Jim Beresford
London Against Camden Danger Lab
www.myspace.com/londonagainstblisslab

Thursday, 1 May 2008

MEDICAL RESEARCH IN THE 21st CENTURY


The debate surrounding the ethics of medical research is an emotive one.

We have all used medicines and products that claim (and many do) to help with this ailment or that medical condition, or vanity products such as hair colourants or aftershave. All have firstly been tested on animals, who are breed for a life of cruel and amoral suffering. The life's these poor souls lead is of constant pain, suffering and degradation - because they are viewed by many in society as a commodity to be used for the benefit of humans.

As someone who is against animal experimentation because of the above reasons, morals do have to come into the equation - and it is morals and ethics that is missing within the medical research and pharmaceutical industry. The UK government does not help matters by continuing to ignore the issue.
Many medical professionals, politicians and layperson alike argue against the use of animals in product testing and science. Alternatives models of testing are not being explored by the UK government the medical research industry despite the wealth of research and information done by modern medical professionals and animal rights campaigners.
Medical research and science innovation is a global industry and like all other profit making industries, will deceive the public and play on the emotions of humans who are suffering with various illnesses and conditions - we can save you - we can eradicate your pain - we can make you young again - make you beautiful - but we must experiment on defenceless animals to do so - the choice is yours!. Put this way it makes it very difficult for all peoples to oppose medical research that is less then ethical.

Medical and scientific research in the UK is lagging behind other industries in decreasing and eventually stopping animal testing on its 'products' - many big name corporations such as Marks and Spencer, the Co-operative and Superdrug (to name a few) produce own brands that have not been tested on animals, and other brand names have already taken on the challenge of reducing and eventually ceasing to sell products tested on animals.

Its now time for medical and scientific researchers and government to do likewise and take on the challenge.